“Leadership has been described as the “process of social
influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support
of others in the accomplishment of a common task".
"Leadership is ultimately about creating
a way for people to contribute to making something extraordinary happen.
"Effective
leadership is the ability to successfully integrate and maximize available
resources within the internal and external environment for the attainment of organizational or societal goals."
Functional theory
Functional
leadership theory is a particularly
useful theory for addressing specific leader behaviors expected to contribute
to organizational or unit effectiveness. This theory argues that the leader's
main job is to see that whatever is necessary to group needs is taken care of;
thus, a leader can be said to have done their job well when they have
contributed to group effectiveness and cohesion.While functional leadership
theory has most often been applied to team leadership, It has also been
effectively applied to broader organizational leadership as well. In
summarizing literature on functional leadership , observed five broad functions
a leader performs when promoting organization's effectiveness. These functions
include environmental monitoring, organizing subordinate activities, teaching
and coaching subordinates, motivating others, and intervening actively in the
group's work.
A variety of
leadership behaviors are expected to facilitate these functions. In initial
work identifying leader behavior,It is observed that subordinates perceived
their supervisors' behavior in terms of two broad categories referred to as consideration and initiating
structure. Consideration includes behavior involved in fostering
effective relationships. Examples of such behavior would include showing
concern for a subordinate or acting in a supportive manner towards others.
Initiating structure involves the actions of the leader focused specifically on
task accomplishment. This could include role clarification, setting performance
standards, and holding subordinates accountable to those standards.
Transactional and transformational Leadership
Eric Berne
first analyzed the relations between a group and its leadership in terms of transactional analysis.
The
transactional leader is given power to perform certain tasks and reward or
punish for the team's performance. It gives the opportunity to the manager to
lead the group and the group agrees to follow his lead to accomplish a predetermined
goal in exchange for something else. Power is given to the leader to evaluate,
correct, and train subordinates when productivity is not up to the desired
level, and reward effectiveness when expected outcome is reached.
The
transformational leader motivates its
team to be effective and efficient. Communication is the base for goal
achievement focusing the group on the final desired outcome or goal attainment.
This leader is highly visible and uses chain of command to get the job done.
Transformational leaders focus on the big picture, needing to be surrounded by
people who take care of the details. The leader is always looking for ideas
that move the organization to reach the company's vision.
Emotions
Leadership can
be perceived as a particularly emotion-laden process, with emotions entwined
with the social influence process.In an organization, the leader's mood has
some effects on his/her group. These effects can be described in 3 levels:
- The mood
of individual group members. Group members with leaders in a positive mood
experience more positive mood than do group members with leaders in a
negative mood. The leaders transmit their moods to other group members
through the mechanism of emotional contagion.Mood contagion
may be one of the psychological mechanisms by which charismatic
leaders influence followers.
- The
affective tone of the group. Group affective tone represents the
consistent or homogeneous affective reactions within a group. Group
affective tone is an aggregate of the moods of the individual members of
the group and refers to mood at the group level of analysis. Groups with
leaders in a positive mood have a more positive affective tone than do
groups with leaders in a negative mood.
- Group
processes like coordination, effort expenditure, and task strategy. Public
expressions of mood impact how group members think and act. When people
experience and express mood, they send signals to others. Leaders signal
their goals, intentions, and attitudes through their expressions of moods.
For example, expressions of positive moods by leaders signal that leaders
deem progress toward goals to be good. The group members respond to those
signals cognitively and behaviorally in ways that are reflected in the
group processes.
In research
about client service, it was found that expressions of positive mood by the leader improve
the performance of the group, although in other sectors there were other
findings.
Beyond the
leader's mood, her/his behavior is a source for employee positive and negative emotions
at work. The leader creates situations and events that lead to emotional
response. Certain leader behaviors displayed during interactions with their
employees are the sources of these affective events. Leaders shape workplace
affective events. Examples – feedback giving, allocating tasks, resource
distribution. Since employee behavior and productivity are directly affected by
their emotional states, it is imperative to consider employee emotional
responses to organizational leaders. Emotional intelligence, the ability to
understand and manage moods and emotions in the self and others, contributes to
effective leadership in organizations.
Neo-emergent theory
Functional leadership model
The
Neo-emergent leadership theory (from the Oxford school of leadership) espouses
that leadership is created through the emergence of information by the leader
or other stakeholders, not through the true actions of the leader himself. In
other words, the reproduction of information or stories form the basis of the
perception of leadership by the majority. It is well known that the great naval
hero Lord Nelson often wrote his own versions of battles he was involved in, so
that when he arrived home in England he would receive a true hero's welcome. In
modern society, the press, blogs and other sources report their own views of a
leader, which may be based on reality, but may also be based on a political
command, a payment, or an inherent interest of the author, media, or leader.
Therefore, it can be contended that the perception of all leaders is created
and in fact does not reflect their true leadership qualities at all.
Leadership Styles
Leadership
style refers to a leader's behavior. It is the result of the philosophy,
personality, and experience of the leader.
Autocratic or authoritarian style
Under the autocratic
leadership style, all decision-making powers are centralized in the leader, as
with dictators.
Leaders do not
entertain any suggestions or initiatives from subordinates. The autocratic
management has been successful as it provides strong motivation to the manager.
It permits quick decision-making, as only one person decides for the whole
group and keeps each decision to him/herself until he/she feels it needs to be
shared with the rest of the group.
Participative or democratic style
The democratic
leadership style favors decision-making by the group. Such a leader gives
instructions after consulting the group.
They can win
the cooperation of their group and can motivate them effectively and
positively. The decisions of the democratic leader are not unilateral as with
the autocrat because they arise from consultation with the group members and
participation by them.
Laissez-faire or free rein style
A free-rein
leader does not lead, but leaves the group entirely to itself. Such a leader
allows maximum freedom to subordinates; they are given a free hand in deciding
their own policies and methods.
Different
situations call for different leadership styles. In an emergency when there is
little time to converge on an agreement and where a designated authority has
significantly more experience or expertise than the rest of the team, an
autocratic leadership style may be most effective; however, in a highly
motivated and aligned team with a homogeneous level of expertise, a more
democratic or laissez-faire style may be more effective. The style adopted
should be the one that most effectively achieves the objectives of the group
while balancing the interests of its individual members.
Narcissistic leadership
Various
academics have identified narcissistic leadership as an important and
common leadership style.
Toxic leadership
A toxic leader
is someone who has responsibility over a group of people or an organization,
and who abuses the leader-follower relationship by leaving the group or
organization in a worse-off condition than when he/she first found them.
Performance
In the past,
some researchers have argued that the actual influence of leaders on
organizational outcomes is overrated and romanticized as a result of biased
attributions about leaders.Despite these assertions, however, it is largely
recognized and accepted by practitioners and researchers that leadership is
important, and research supports the notion that leaders do contribute to key
organizational outcomes.To facilitate successful performance it is important to
understand and accurately measure leadership performance.
Job performance
generally refers to behavior that is expected to contribute to organizational
success.It is identified a number of specific types of performance dimensions;
leadership was one of the dimensions that is identified. There is no
consistent, overall definition of leadership performance.Many distinct
conceptualizations are often lumped together under the umbrella of leadership performance,
including outcomes such as leader effectiveness,
leader advancement, and leader emergence.For instance, leadership performance
may be used to refer to the career success of the individual leader,
performance of the group or organization, or even leader emergence. Each of
these measures can be considered conceptually distinct. While these aspects may
be related, they are different outcomes and their inclusion should depend on
the applied or research focus
In prehistoric
times, humanity was preoccupied with personal security, maintenance,
protection, and survival. Now humanity spends a major portion of waking hours
working for organizations. The need to identify with a community that provides
security, protection, maintenance, and a feeling of belonging has continued
unchanged from prehistoric times. This need is met by the informal organization
and its emergent, or unofficial, leaders.
Leaders emerge
from within the structure of the informal organization. Their personal
qualities, the demands of the situation, or a combination of these and other
factors attract followers who accept their leadership within one or several
overlay structures. Instead of the authority of position held by an appointed
head or chief, the emergent leader wields influence or power. Influence is the
ability of a person to gain co-operation from others by means of persuasion or
control over rewards. Power is a stronger form of influence because it reflects
a person's ability to enforce action through the control of a means of
punishment.
A leader is a
person who influences a group of people towards a specific result. It is not
dependent on title or formal authority.somebody defines an effective leader
"as an individual with the capacity to consistently succeed in a given
condition and be viewed as meeting the expectations of an organization or
society." Leaders are recognized by their capacity for caring for others,
clear communication, and a commitment to persist. An individual who is
appointed to a managerial position has the right to command and enforce
obedience by virtue of the authority of his position. However, she or he must
possess adequate personal attributes to match this authority, because authority
is only potentially available to him/her. In the absence of sufficient personal
competence, a manager may be confronted by an emergent leader who can challenge
her/his role in the organization and reduce it to that of a figurehead.
However, only authority of position has the backing of formal sanctions. It
follows that whoever wields personal influence and power can legitimize this
only by gaining a formal position in the hierarchy, with commensurate
authority. Leadership can be defined as one's ability to get others to
willingly follow. Every organization needs leaders at every level.
Management
Over the years
the philosophical terminology of "management" and
"leadership" have, in the organizational context, been used both as
synonyms and with clearly differentiated meanings. Debate is fairly common
about whether the use of these terms should be restricted, and generally
reflects an awareness of the distinction made by Burns between "transactional" leadership
(characterized by e.g. emphasis on procedures, contingent reward, management by
exception) and "transformational" leadership (characterized by e.g.
charisma, personal relationships, creativity).
Group leadership
In contrast to
individual leadership, some organizations have adopted group leadership. In
this situation, more than one person provides direction to the group as a
whole. Some organizations have taken this approach in hopes of increasing
creativity, reducing costs, or downsizing. Others may see the traditional
leadership of a boss as costing too much in team performance.
In some situations, the team members best able to handle any given phase of the
project become the temporary leaders. Additionally, as each team member has the
opportunity to experience the elevated level of empowerment, it energizes staff
and feeds the cycle of success.
Leaders who
demonstrate persistence, tenacity, determination, and synergistic communication
skills will bring out the same qualities in their groups. Good leaders use
their own inner mentors to energize their team and organizations and lead a
team to achieve success.
These Group
Leaderships or Leadership Teams have specific characteristics:
Characteristics
of a Team
·
There must be an awareness of unity on the part of all its
members.
·
There must be interpersonal relationship. Members must
have a chance to contribute, and learn from and work with others.
·
The members must have the ability to act together toward
a common goal.
Ten
characteristics of well-functioning teams:
·
Purpose: Members proudly share a sense of why the team
exists and are invested in accomplishing its mission and goals.
·
Priorities: Members know what needs to be done next, by
whom, and by when to achieve team goals.
·
Roles: Members know their roles in getting tasks done and
when to allow a more skillful member to do a certain task.
·
Decisions: Authority and decision-making lines are
clearly understood.
·
Conflict: Conflict is dealt with openly and is considered
important to decision-making and personal growth.
·
Personal traits: members feel their unique personalities
are appreciated and well utilized.
·
Norms: Group norms for working together are set and seen
as standards for every one in the groups.
·
Effectiveness: Members find team meetings efficient and
productive and look forward to this time together.
·
Success: Members know clearly when the team has met with
success and share in this equally and proudly.
·
Training: Opportunities for feedback and updating skills
are provided and taken advantage of by team members.
Leadership Myths
Leadership, although largely talked about, has been described as one of the least understood concepts across all cultures and civilizations. Over the years, many researchers have stressed the prevalence of this misunderstanding, stating that the existence of several flawed assumptions, or myths, concerning leadership often interferes with individuals’ conception of what leadership is all about.Myth 1 – Leadership is innate
According to some, leadership is determined by distinctive dispositional characteristics present at birth (e.g., extraversion; intelligence; ingenuity). However, it is important to note that leadership also develops through hard work and careful observation.Thus, effective leadership can result from nature (i.e., innate talents) as well as nurture (i.e., acquired skills).Myth 2 – Leadership is possessing power over others
Although leadership is certainly a form of power, it is not demarcated by power over people – rather, it is a power with people that exists as a reciprocal relationship between a leader and his/her followers , Despite popular belief, the use of manipulation, coercion, and domination to influence others is not a requirement for leadership. In actuality, individuals who seek group consent and strive to act in the best interests of others can also become effective leaders (e.g., class president; court judge).Myth 3 – Leaders are positively influential
The validity of the assertion that groups flourish when guided by effective leaders can be illustrated using several examples. For instance, the bystander effect (failure to respond or offer assistance) that tends to develop within groups faced with an emergency is significantly reduced in groups guided by a leader. Moreover, it has been documented that group performance, creativity, and efficiency all tend to climb in businesses with designated managers or CEOs. However, the difference leaders make is not always positive in nature. Leaders sometimes focus on fulfilling their own agendas at the expense of others, including his/her own followers. Leaders who focus on personal gain by employing stringent and manipulative leadership styles often make a difference, but usually do so through negative means.Myth 4 – Leaders entirely control group outcomes
In Western cultures it is generally assumed that group leaders make all the difference when it comes to group influence and overall goal-attainment. Although common, this romanticized view of leadership (i.e., the tendency to overestimate the degree of control leaders have over their groups and their groups’ outcomes) ignores the existence of many other factors that influence group dynamics.For example, group cohesion, communication patterns among members, individual personality traits, group context, the nature or orientation of the work, as well as behavioral norms and established standards influence group functionality in varying capacities. For this reason, it is unwarranted to assume that all leaders are in complete control of their groups' achievements.Myth 5 – All groups have a designated leader
Despite preconceived notions, all groups need not have a designated leader. Groups that are primarily composed of women, are limited in size, are free from stressful decision-making, or only exist for a short period of time (e.g., student work groups; pub quiz/trivia teams) often undergo a diffusion of responsibility, where leadership tasks and roles are shared amongst members.Myth 6 – Group members resist leaders
Although research has indicated that group members’ dependence on group leaders can lead to reduced self-reliance and overall group strength, most people actually prefer to be led than to be without a leader This "need for a leader" becomes especially strong in troubled groups that are experiencing some sort of conflict. Group members tend to be more contented and productive when they have a leader to guide them. Although individuals filling leadership roles can be a direct source of resentment for followers, most people appreciate the contributions that leaders make to their groups and consequently welcome the guidance of a leader .
Leadership is a matter of intelligence, trustworthiness, humaneness, courage, and discipline . . . Reliance on intelligence alone results in rebelliousness. Exercise of humaneness alone results in weakness. Fixation on trust results in folly. Dependence on the strength of courage results in violence. Excessive discipline and sternness in command result in cruelty. When one has all five virtues together, each appropriate to its function, then one can be a leader. — Sun Tzu
gr8 article on leadership...
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete